Sunday, December 09, 2012

Two Defeats And A Selection

The last time India lost 2 home Tests in a series was when Ricky Ponting's Australians visited India late in 2004. Before that, it was Hansie Cronje's South Africans in 2000. Sachin Tendulkar resigned as captain after the Bangalore Test in 2000 (a 5th consecutive defeat). Sourav Ganguly led India in their next two series against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe. In 2004-05, Ganguly continued to captain India for the rest of the 2004-05 season. He even led the team to Zimbabwe in 2005. He was sacked as captain at the end of that series. Since then, India's captaincy has changed hands under happier circumstances. Rahul Dravid quit after beating England in England in 2007, while Anil Kumble retired in the midst of a dominant Indian performance against the visiting Australians in 2008. Mahendra Singh Dhoni took over and has led India to unprecedented success. Perhaps it is worth revisiting a little bit of history here, because I sense that we have lost perspective substantially (as we normally do) with India losing Tests against a good English side (but not one in the class of Ponting's 2004 Australians).



This chart shows Series and Test results under each Indian captain. In recent years, the Away results have improved, I would argue in real terms. Under Ganguly, India won 11 Away Tests out of 28, but 6 out of those 11 were in Bangladesh or Zimbabwe. Since Ganguly was sacked, under Dravid, Kumble and Dhoni, India have built a 12-17 Away record in 43 Tests. Only 2 of those 12 wins came in Bangladesh or Zimbabwe. Whats more, until recently, that Away record was a winning one - something unprecedented in India's cricket history.


Until recently.

The Tendulkar-Dravid-Ganguly-Laxman-Kumble-Zaheer-Harbhajan-Sehwag-Dhoni Test era is now at an end. Who knows, Sehwag may blast a big century at Nagpur and India may win to restore parity in the series, but even if they do, most of those players have left the team, and the ones who remain are not going to last very long. Zaheer and Harbhajan have been dropped. Tendulkar will quit very soon.

What of Dhoni? Opinion is divided on Dhoni. For most of his tenure, Dhoni's unflappable calm seemed to rub off on India's headline-hungry corps of reporters. Until the massive defeats in England and Australia, his authority was unquestioned. Since then they have complained that he's too unflappable in word and deed, that his keeping is no good, and that his batting is terrible.

There is undoubted quality in the new Indian batsmen. It used to be that the ability of Indian batsmen to score in front of the wicket against fast bowling was in question. I am not talking about technique or the ability to play the short ball (a problem which very few Indian batsmen have actually had in my view - it is not an especially Indian problem), but about having strokes in front of the wicket against bowling at 90 miles per hour. VVS had this ability, as does Sehwag. Virat Kohli has demonstrated this ability amply. One of the reasons why the selectors (and Dhoni) persisted with Suresh Raina as much as they did, was because he has this ability. Its the same with Yuvraj Singh. The problems faced by India when it comes to finding Test batsmen are not what they used to be. There is stroke making talent aplenty. The question now, is whether these players have staying power. Whether, like Tendulkar once did famously against Curtly Ambrose in West Indies in 1997, they have the discipline to survive a session - to shelve their strokes and wait if they realize that a bowler is bowling too well. Tendulkar made 12 runs in that session. Imagine. The Tendulkar of 1997. He was 24 years old at the time, the same age as Kohli, Pujara and Rahane are now.

The bowling is a bigger worry. For many years, India could find decent spin bowlers to support Anil Kumble. Before Harbhajan Singh came along as a massively talented off spinner, Venkatpathy Raju, Rajesh Chauhan and a host of other spinners backed Kumble. It remains an open question as to where the next potential Anil Kumble will come from. Over the last 6 years, India have benefited additionally from having Zaheer Khan mature into a world class bowler. That transition came after he was dropped from the side in 2006. Does Zaheer have another phase in him? If he does, I doubt that it will be more than a couple of years. Glenn McGrath retired at 36.

The selectors have dropped an interesting set of players. One gets the sense that they were much surer about who they wanted to drop, than who they wanted to pick as replacements. They have chosen a fast bowler on performance, a leg spinner in hope, and a batsman partly on performance and partly, one suspects, on character. Ravindra Jadeja seems to me to be India's Mohammad Hafeez. Of the three, only Parvinder Awana is likely to get a Test debut. From what little one has seen of him, Awana looks every inch the journeyman medium-fast bowler.

A lot of has been said about how India have been in denial. Some have said it better than others. But perhaps the selectors and the team management will have to lower their sights for a bit. Play makeshift players in some positions again. Ravichandran Ashwin is too good to be dropped and not good enough to be a specialist spinner. Virender Sehwag is also too good to be dropped, but a luxury against the new ball - one India can no longer afford given the inexperience in the middle order.

Ashwin will go one of two ways. He will either have a long term stint in the Test team as a Ravi Shastri like player, or he will lose his spot just like Irfan Pathan did. Irfan was another player who was too good to be dropped, but not good enough to be a specialist Test bowler.

A lot will depend on the wicket at Nagpur. But in the next 12 months or so, India will need to play as if they are a new team. It is time to be uncertain again. For the established players, perhaps this means new challenges. For MS Dhoni, it might mean quitting the Test team. India may want to invest in a Test captain in Virat Kohli the way South Africa invested in Graeme Smith. Kohli could do a lot worse than seek a County contract for 2013 to play 3 months of Championship cricket.

For Nagpur, hopefully the team management will build on the signals that the selectors have sent. The following batting order may be appropriate:

Ashwin
Gambhir
Sehwag
Tendulkar
Pujara
Kohli
Rahane
Dhoni
Ishant
Ojha
Awana

Correction: I mistakenly wrote that the venue for the last Test is Chennai. The last Test is at Nagpur. Thanks to all who pointed out the mistake.

13 comments:

  1. I'd much rather debut Jadeja in this match than go with Gambhir again. My line would have been Rahane, Pujara, Tendulkar, Kohli, Sehwag, Ashwin, Jadeja, Dhoni, Ojha, Awana, Ishant.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ashwin is not good enough a batsman to come in at #6, let alone open the batting, especially when you have considered him one of 4 bowlers.
    He is good at #8, but unless he steps up his bowling contribution, he cannot be a long-term prospect for the Indian team.

    Gambhir is my choice for the chop, given his nakedly selfish red-ink targetting innings in Mumbai, at the cost of the team, and the poor calling and running in Calcutta. It is hard to establish motives based on results however, it does seem like Gambhir's mind is currently cob-webbed with worries about his own survival. This is fine, but he has been letting it affect the team prospects.

    We all have heard the story about Imran Khan dropping a player who played a safe game(for himself) at the cost of the team, even though the team did manage to win eventually.

    Dhoni himself must choose - he is over-worked. Ideally, he should choose just the ODIs and focus on the 2015 world cup. Neither T20s nor tests are his natural game, and he can make history if he retains the WC in Australia, which, he is capable of if he focusses on that alone. But his commercial profile - short term profile - will not allow that. Sigh!

    There is no obvious replacement for Dhoni as keeper, but it is not as if we are replacing Gilchrist, or even Prior at this poitn so we might as well start the search for the next w/k. Saha, Patel(who is only 27), Karthik all can be stop-gapped until we find the real Dhoni replacement.

    Coming back to Ashwin, maybe one way we can use him as a batsman is to get him at #7 ahead of Dhoni. That way, we have the psychological ploy of Dhoni at #8. No matter what his form is, the bowling team will be wary of that.
    Saying that, not sure if Ashwin will fly at #7.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'd wager a small amount on this team doing decently for now

    Rahane, Sehwag/Gambhir, Pujara, Kohli, Tendulkar, Tiwary/Sehwag, Ashwin/Dhoni, Dhoni/Harbhajan, Ishant, Awana/Zaheer, Ojha

    I'd prefer Sehwag to open as of now - not the least because without Sehwag, we seem to crawl along at 2 RPO and hand over the initiative to the bowlers. However, we'll need to see if Chand or someone steps up for that position - Mukund has fallen away and Dhawan has all but disappeared.

    Gambhir could stop-gap until we solve the opener problem.

    One thing I dont udnerstand is why Zaheer walks in at #9 when Ishant and Ojha are better blockers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. For your information DHoni has never lost a series at home.. the curent series isnt lost yet

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All it takes is one series to change the record.

      Delete
  5. Gautam Gambhir deserves the axe for his selfishness not only in Mumbai but from earlier. Feigning injury in England and in South Africa when we last visited these countries. No stomach for a fight. Would rather protect his average and his place. Also a poor fielder

    ReplyDelete
  6. If the Nagpur pitch is anywhere like the Mumbai one, Jadeja should play. His brand of quickish left-arm spin is what the doctor orders. If Pak trounced England 3-0, it was because of the quickish spin of Abdur Rehman and the impenetrable Saeed Ajmal. Flight is an over-rated virtue.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Opening with Ashwin, You an idiot? Ashwin can bat higher up the order but not in Top 5....

    I hope they select Awana....i don't care about the 2nd fast bowler....but would like to give Ishant one more chance....

    Also Select Rahane...he should either Open or Play in Middle Order...would have liked if Selectors would dropped Gambhir as well...his numbers for last 3 years are not good....

    ReplyDelete
  8. play ashwin as an all rounder and not a specialist spinner,
    6 batsman, 1 all rounder and 4 bowlers should be it

    Ashwin did very well outside India also. I would say he's a better batsman than Irfan

    ReplyDelete
  9. I believe Sehwag is still the best option at the top in India. Also my guess would be that Jadeja and Dinda will be playing ahead of Rahane and Awana. Though I would prefer Awana to Dinda for added penetration.
    The best way to fire up Virat would be to demote him to No.6.
    High time Gambhir is given the boot. Top 3 have to be people who will score big once they get in. Cannot afford to have an opener scoring 50s to save his place.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Under Indian conditions, it is better to play sehwag as an opener. The ball doesn't really swing or move of the pitch here. Neither does it bounce. That is perfect for his brand of cricket. If he comes in the middle it is going to be lot difficult as the ball will both spin and reverse, and will quickly consume him, as we all know he has little patience to negotiate such balls in his current form. We just have to hope that he plays a bit longer at the top and crucially makes more runs than 30's or 40's. No point expecting him to stick around and play longer innings and score runs, as he did in the past. He is too susceptible against a moving ball. On ashwin, he clearly has a sound batting technique (saw that he was one of our best batsmen even on the bouncy Australian pitches). He should be groomed to be a number 6. He showed great maturity and technique in how racked up those 2 partnerships with number 10 and 11, in the last test. He knows how to farm the strike, how to protect his partner and importantly how to make runs. Also, while his bowling has not worked well, he has shown he has that fierce competitive streak in him. I am sure that if he is told clearly that he will be groomed as a proper batting all rounder, and then help him in improving his bowling consistency (he will feel less pressurized from other bowler only contenders that should help him relax and focus better), we will have genuine all rounder (much better than Ravi shastri). Ash win's batting technique was the best among all the younger batsmen, including gambhir. He is very sure of his movements, not fidgety especially, plays the pull shot extremely well. So time to slot him and groom him correctly, especially in these awful days for Indian cricket.

    ReplyDelete
  11. My team
    Sehwag
    Rahane
    Pujara
    Sachin
    Kohli
    Jadeja
    Ashwin
    Dhoni
    Awana
    Ishant
    Ojha

    ReplyDelete